Blood pressure is the force exerted by circulating blood in blood vessels. Raised blood pressure causes damage to the inside walls of arterial blood vessels and leads to hardening of the arterial walls. High blood pressure is medically termed as hypertension. Hypertension is usually defined as blood pressure exceeding a certain threshold. Two main types of hypertension can be distinguished. In a large majority of cases (95%), no underlying medical cause of hypertension can be identified and essential hypertension is diagnosed. A small minority of cases is secondary to other medical conditions.
The prevalence of high blood pressure in Europe is generally high with substantial differences between countries
Hypertension is a very common condition, particularly in industrialised societies. The prevalence of hypertension among adults aged 35-74 years is estimated to range from about 30 to 60% in European countries. At age 65-74 years, 50 to 80% of the general population in European and North American countries exhibit hypertension. Generally, there is a north-south and east-west gradient in mean population blood pressure with higher levels in northern and eastern European countries. Mean population blood pressure decreased in most European countries over the last two decades but ageing of the population and the increasing prevalence of obesity may stop this trend. Awareness of the condition among individuals with high blood pressure has been shown to be relatively low ranging from about 30 to 70% in different countries. Blood pressure is generally lower among women than among men until the sixth decade of life and may become the same or slightly higher from age 60 onwards.
High blood pressure is a major cardiovascular risk factor
The risk of vascular disease increases progressively with rising blood pressure. Any threshold for the definition of high blood pressure, or hypertension, is therefore arbitrary though commonly applied in clinical practice. High blood pressure is a major risk factor for an array of vascular diseases. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke are the most common consequences of high blood pressure and the most frequent cardiovascular diseases in the population. It has been estimated that globally about 47% of IHD and 54% of stroke may occur due to suboptimal blood pressure. High blood pressure is very commonly accompanied by additional risk factors such as high cholesterol or smoking which also determine vascular risk. It is therefore important to consider high blood pressure not as an isolated risk factor but rather in the context of the total cardiovascular risk.
High blood pressure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide
Estimates indicate that globally about one quarter of the adult population suffers from hypertension. About 13% of worldwide mortality may be attributable to high blood pressure. In developed countries, like in the European region, this figure amounts to approximately 20% of the total mortality burden. In terms of loss of healthy life expressed in disability adjusted life years (DALYs), high blood pressure is the second leading cause of disability worldwide and the leading cause in developed countries. Estimations indicate that about 13% of total DALYs lost in the WHO European region are due to high blood pressure.
Unhealthy lifestyle promotes high blood pressure
Several causal factors for high blood pressure related to lifestyle have been identified. Weight gain leads to blood pressure increase. Physical inactivity is associated with higher blood pressure. Alcohol consumption is almost linearly related to blood pressure, though light to moderate drinking does not seem to raise blood pressure permanently. Dietary factors including excess sodium intake, insufficient intake of fruits and vegetables, high consumption of saturated fat, low fish consumption, and low potassium intake contribute to high blood pressure.
High blood pressure is treatable and can be partly prevented
The primary aim of medical treatment of established hypertension is to reduce long-term risk of vascular disease as much as possible which requires lowering of blood pressure itself and treatment of all other modifiable vascular risk factors. A variety of effective pharmacological agents for blood pressure lowering is available. Medication therapy and lifestyle interventions are complementary approaches in hypertension treatment. Lifestyle interventions that have proved to effectively lower blood pressure are: weight loss, increased physical exercise, moderation of alcohol consumption, dietary sodium restriction, and other dietary changes such as increased fruit and vegetable intake, less consumption of saturated fat, or increased fish and potassium intake. Lifestyle interventions are crucial in primary prevention and may prevent the onset of hypertension.
A public health strategy is warranted in primary prevention of hypertension
A small decrease in population blood pressure is likely to result in a substantial reduction in cardiovascular disease and mortality. Because of the high prevalence of high blood pressure and the high lifetime risk of hypertension, a population-based strategy aiming at a downward shift of blood pressure in the general population is an important component of hypertension prevention. A high-risk approach aiming at blood pressure reductions in those who are at particular risk to develop hypertension is recommended to complement the population approach.
16 March 2009
Blood pressure
Definition and scope
High blood pressure causes damage to blood vessels
Blood pressure is the force exerted by circulating blood on the inside walls of blood vessels. The pressure wave transmitted by the movement of blood along the arteries with each heartbeat is felt as the pulse. Two components of blood pressure can be distinguished: the highest pressure (systolic blood pressure, SBP) occurs each time the heart pushes blood into the arteries and the lowest pressure (diastolic blood pressure, DBP) occurs when the heart fills with blood. The mean arterial pressure is the average pressure over one complete cardiac cycle. Blood pressure is determined by the interplay of cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance. Vasoconstriction leads to an increase in total peripheral resistance and blood pressure. The majority of patients with hypertension have a normal cardiac output but a raised peripheral resistance which is determined by the presence of small arterioles (Beevers et al., 2001). An increased blood pressure leads to damage of the arterial walls and to atherosclerosis.
Definition of high blood pressure in current clinical guidelines
High blood pressure, medically referred to as hypertension, is usually defined on the basis of thresholds for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, measured in mmHg. However, systolic and diastolic blood pressure show a continuous, consistent and independent relationship with cardiovascular diseases. Mortality from cardiovascular diseases increases linearly and progressively with increasing blood pressure levels above 115 mmHg systolic and 75 mmHg diastolic, as explained further in the Consequences section (Lewington et al., 2002). Given the continuous nature of this association, any classification of hypertension based on cutoff values is arbitrary. Despite this fact, for practical reasons and to guide clinicians, definitions and classifications of high blood pressure have been issued and continuously modified by major societies and organisations. Recent guidelines have been issued by:
In addition, most countries, such as, for example, the United Kingdom, France and Germany have adopted national hypertension guidelines and recommendations.
Thresholds for hypertension should only be used under certain conditions
The 2007 ESH/ ESC Guidelines emphasise the arbitrariness of thresholds to classify hypertension. For clinical purposes and to facilitate treatment approaches in daily practice, the guidelines propose a classification scheme that may be used under the following conditions (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007):
When SBP and DBP fall into different categories a risk assessment and treatment decision should be made for the higher category;
Isolated systolic hypertension (only SBP is elevated) should be graded according to the same SBP values indicated for systolic-diastolic hypertension. The association of high SBP with low DBP can be regarded as an additional risk;
Thresholds for hypertension and the need for drug treatment should be regarded as flexible based on the total cardiovascular risk.
European guidelines recommend different hypertension thresholds than American guidelines
As shown in the tables below, the existing European guidelines recommend different hypertension thresholds than the American guidelines.
European Guidelines for the classification of blood pressure levels (mmHg) (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007)
Category
Systolic
Diastolic
Optimal
<120
<80
Normal
120-129
80-84
High normal
130-139
85-89
Grade 1 hypertension
140-159
90-99
Grade 2 hypertension
160-179
100-109
Grade 3 hypertension
≥180
≥110
Isolated systolic hypertension
≥140
<90
Isolated systolic blood pressure should be graded (1,2,3) according to systolic blood pressure values in the ranges indicated, provided that diastolic values are <90 mmHg. Grades 1, 2 and 3 correspond to classification in mild, moderate and severe hypertension, respectively. These terms have now been omitted to avoid confusion with quantification of total cardiovascular risk.
Worldwide, 26.4% of the adult population in 2000 suffered from hypertension (according to the following definition: average blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive medication, Kearney et al., 2005). In absolute numbers, 972 million adults had hypertension. These figures are predicted to increase by about 60% to 1.56 billion in the year 2025 (Kearney et al., 2005). As shown in Frequency of hypertension in people aged 20 years and older, the frequency of hypertension varies in different regions of the world and is lowest in parts of Asia and highest in established market economies, former socialist economies, and Latin America and the Caribbean. In established market economies such as Western European countries, North America and Japan, the prevalence of hypertension ranges between 20–50%.
Lack of routine monitoring and methodological differences restrict comparability of data
Comparable, representative and recent data on blood pressure and on the prevalence of hypertension for all EU member states are not available at present. Data on blood pressure are usually not collected in routine monitoring of health indicators, but rather in specific surveys which are often regional. Methodological differences in blood pressure measurement and data collection between countries also restrict the validity of comparing blood pressure data from surveys.
MONICA project shows substantial differences in the prevalence of hypertension between European countries
The most comparable data on blood pressure in different European countries are available from the WHO MONICA project. The project included representative, population-based samples from predefined regions. Blood pressure and other risk factors were assessed in a highly standardized way. The most recent data on blood pressure in the WHO MONICA project originate from the mid-1990s. As shown in Average systolic blood pressure among men and Average systolic blood pressure among women, the mean systolic blood pressure for the age group 35-64 varies considerably across countries and is generally lower in women than in men (WHO MONICA, 2003).
When a threshold of 140/90 mmHg is applied, prevalence of elevated blood pressure ranges from 19% to 60% among men and from 20% to 54% in women (Antikainen et al., 2006). Generally, blood pressure appears to be higher in North-Eastern European countries than in South-Western European countries.
Prevalence of hypertension in European countries is substantially higher than in North America
Whereas MONICA data use regional surveys, data presented in Prevalence of hypertension originate from population-based national surveys in England, Finland, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Canada and the United States that were conducted in 1988–1999 (Wolf-Maier et al., 2003). Participants in all but one of the surveys were aged 35-74 years (Spain: 35-65). The prevalence of hypertension in the European countries among men, based on the standard cut-off point of 140/ 90 mmHg or use of antihypertensive treatment, ranged from 45% in Italy and Sweden to 60% in Germany. Among women, the prevalence ranged from 31% in Italy to 50% in Germany. The respective data for North America (Canada and United States combined) indicate a much lower prevalence of hypertension in both men (30%) and women (25%). For a more detailed overview see Prevalence of hypertension. Across the whole age range, the Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure is higher in the combined European countries than in North America.
The validity of the above comparisons between European countries is, however, limited, due to the differences in blood pressure measurement methods, age ranges, survey dates, participation rates and sampling methods (Wolf-Maier et al., 2003).
Blood pressure has declined in most developed countries over the last decades
Individual populations differed considerably, but overall mean SBP (DBP) fell by 2.2 (1.4) mmHg in men and 3.3 (2.2) mmHg in women (Tunstall-Pedoe et al., 2006). Average declines were similar across the whole range of blood pressure readings and no differential fall in high readings attributable to more effective medication treatment was observed. Using the 160/95 mmHg and the 140/90 mmHg cut-off points, hypertension prevalence decreased in most of the MONICA populations (Antikainen et al., 2006).
Similarly, hypertension prevalence decreased in the United States until the beginning of the 1990s, but this trend was more recently reversed and the last available data from the NHANES 1999-2002 suggest increasing hypertension prevalence (Hajjar & Kotchen, 2003, Hajjar et al., 2006). There are no reliable recent trend summaries from Europe.
Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the population
Community surveillance that has been carried out in the field of hypertension offers the opportunity to evaluate the awareness, treatment, and control of high BP. Awareness is defined as reporting a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Treatment is defined as the use of antihypertensive medication. Control is defined as a blood pressure below a certain threshold, most commonly below 140/ 90 mm Hg. In national surveys from European countries (see above), awareness among those with BP ≥140/ 90 mmHg ranges from 36% in England and Germany to 52% in Italy (Wolf-Maier et al., 2004).
As shown in Hypertension awareness, treatment and control, the proportion of the population with a BP ≥140/ 90 mmHg receiving antihypertensive treatment varies between 25% in England and 32% in Italy. Overall control of hypertension among those aware of high BP amounts to 5% in Spain and up to 10% in England. Among those receiving antihypertensive treatment, control rates range from 19% in Spain to 40% in the England (Wolf-Maier et al., 2004). Compared to European countries, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension appear to be substantially higher in the USA and Canada. In all countries, women have higher awareness, treatment and control rates than men. These data originate from 1986-1999 and blood pressure control may have increased since that time. The MONICA study shows that awareness, treatment and control of hypertension increased in the majority of study centres from the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s (Antikainen et al., 2006). More recent population-based investigations from Greece (Psaltopoulou et al., 2004), the Netherlands (Scheltens et al., 2007), and Portugal (Macedo et al., 2005) show awareness, treatment and control rates in the same order of magnitude.
Higher prevalence of high blood pressure among lower socio-economic groups
Analyses from eight nationally representative health surveys in Europe show that elevated blood pressure occurs more frequently in lower educated groups (as an indicator of socio-economic position) than in the higher educated population (Dalstra et al., 2005). This socio-economic difference in the prevalence of elevated blood pressure decreases in later life and is greater among women than among men. Also see EUphocus Health Inequalities.
16 March 2009
Blood pressure
Consequences for individual and society
High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease
Blood pressure is continuously related to cardiovascular disease. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke are the most common consequences of high blood pressure and the most frequent cardiovascular diseases in the population. Every 20 mmHg systolic or 10 mmHg diastolic increase in blood pressure doubles the mortality from IHD and stroke at age 40-69 years and increases IHD and stroke mortality at age 70-89 years by 50% (Lewington et al., 2002). For a more complete overview see Ischaemic heart disease mortality rate and Stroke mortality rate in each decade of age versus blood pressure at the start of that decade.
Estimates from observational research and clinical trials suggest that a 10 mmHg decrease in systolic blood pressure (or 5 mmHg decrease in diastolic blood pressure) reduces the risk of IHD by approximately 20 to 25% and the risk of stroke by 30 to 40% (Lawes et al., 2002; Lawes et al., 2004; also see Interventions). This reduction in risk applies to fatal and non-fatal events, to males and females, and across regions.
The proportional association of blood pressure with IHD and stroke is modified by age. As shown in Age-specific hazard ratios the slope of the association is steepest in younger age and flattens with ageing but remains continuous in higher age groups. Between the ages of 40 and 69 years, each increase of 20 mm Hg SBP or 10 mmHg DBP is associated with a doubling in mortality from stroke, IHD and other vascular disease. Between the ages of 70 and 89 years, there is still a strong relationship between blood pressure and mortality, but the order of magnitude is slightly smaller (1.5-fold increase in vascular mortality with a 20/ 10 mm Hg increase in SBP/DBP) This highlights the importance of early Interventions.
High blood pressure is a major precursor for heart failure and further vascular diseases
High blood pressure increases the risk of heart failure two to threefold and accounts for about half of heart failure burden in the general population (Kannel, 2000; Lloyd-Jones et al., 2002). High blood pressure is linked to heart failure in two ways. Firstly, high blood pressure itself leads to structural and functional impairment of the heart muscle resulting in heart failure. Secondly, high blood pressure is a risk factor for coronary heart disease, and heart failure is a common consequence of coronary heart disease (Meredith & Ostergren, 2006).
High blood pressure also increases the risk of peripheral artery disease, and end stage renal disease (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007). High blood pressure can further harm blood vessels in the eye and lead to eye disease. In summary, high blood pressure is a major risk factor for an array of cardiovascular diseases.
High blood pressure affects cognitive function
High blood pressure is associated with cognitive impairment. Cognitive decline and dementia occur more frequently in persons with high blood pressure, due in part to the intermediate outcomes of blood pressure, such as cardiovascular disease and in particular stroke (so-called ‘vascular dementia’) (Staessen et al., 2007). Long-term studies show that raised systolic blood pressure in midlife increases the risk of dementia in late-life (Freitag et al., 2006; Kivipelto et al., 2001). High blood pressure not only raises the risk of vascular dementia but appears to be also a risk factor for dementia of Alzheimer’s type (Breteler, 2000; Staessen et al., 2007).
High blood pressure is a major component of global cardiovascular risk
It is important to look at high blood pressure in the context of total cardiovascular risk. In the majority of cases, high blood pressure is accompanied by other risk factors. See Ischaemic Heart Disease- Causes and risk factors for an overview of these other risk factors. The various risk factors for cardiovascular disease interact and together determine the total cardiovascular risk. As can be seen from Absolute risk of cardiovascular disease over 5 years, the absolute risk for otherwise healthy individuals is small, even at a very high systolic blood pressure level, but increases dramatically with the presence of additional risk factors. Therefore, high blood pressure should not be regarded as an isolated risk factor but in the context of other risk factors.
High blood pressure may be responsible for half of disease burden from coronary heart disease and stroke
Globally, about 47% of IHD and 54% of strokes may be attributable to suboptimal systolic blood pressure exceeding 115 mmHg (Lawes et al., 2008). Estimates from INTERHEART, a worldwide case-control study on coronary heart disease, indicate that 22% of IHD in Western Europe and 25% of IHD in Central and Eastern Europe may be due to a history of high blood pressure(Yusuf et al., 2004). The reliability of these data is, however, limited, both because high blood pressure in this study was self-reported rather than measured and because the case-control design is prone to bias.
Data from 600,000 participants in the Asia-Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration, using the common hypertension definition of blood pressure >140/ 90 mmHg, reveal that 4 to 28% of IHD in men and 8 to 39% in women may be caused by hypertension. The corresponding ranges for haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke among males were 18 to 66% and 8 to 44%, and 15 to 49% and 12 to 45% in females (Martiniuk et al., 2007). It should be noted, however, that these data cannot be directly translated to the European region, due to differences in hypertension prevalence, disease incidence and stroke subtypes.
High blood pressure is the leading risk factor for mortality worldwide
High blood pressure is the most important risk factor in terms of attributable mortality worldwide. Estimates from the WHO GBDS indicate that approximately 13% of global mortality may be attributed to high blood pressure translating into more than 7 million deaths per year (Lopez et al., 2006).
In developed countries, the impact of high blood pressure on mortality is estimated to be even more important. According to the GBDS, 20.1% of deaths among males and 23.9% among females in the European region and other developed countries may be due to high blood pressure (WHO, 2002d). Mortality attributed to high blood pressure is equally distributed between males and females (49 vs. 51%) and occurs mainly in older age (81% at age 60 years and older vs. 19% at age 15-59 years) (Rodgers et al., 2004).
High blood pressure is a leading cause of loss of healthy life
In terms of DALYs, an indicator for loss of healthy life, high blood pressure is the second major cause of disability worldwide next to childhood underweight (Lopez et al., 2006).
The GBDS estimates that 5.6% of DALYs in low-and middle income countries and 9.3% in high-income countries are attributable to high blood pressure. Estimations for the WHO European Region show that high blood pressure is the leading cause of disability in this region accounting for 12.8% of total DALYs (WHO, 2002d). See also Shares of seven leading risk factors in the DALY burden.
The majority of disease burden from suboptimal blood pressure occurs in the middle age-groups
A study analysing the global disease burden from systolic blood pressure greater than 115 mmHg estimates that approximately two thirds of the disease burden occurs in the age-group 45-69 years (Lawes et al., 2006). About half of this disease burden occurs in individuals with systolic blood pressure levels between 130 and 150 mmHg.
16 March 2009
Blood pressure
Causes and risk factors
High blood pressure is caused by underlying disease in minority of cases
In 95% of cases no identifiable cause of high blood pressure is found and the condition is diagnosed as ‘essential hypertension’. In the vast minority of cases (between 2% and 5%), particular diseases such as kidney disease or adrenal disease cause hypertension and the condition is labelled ‘secondary hypertension’ (Messerli et al., 2007). For a complete overview see the list of identifiable causes of hypertension.
If the cause cannot be identified, high blood pressure may be due to an unfavourable lifestyle or particular risk factors.
Age is a major determinant of high blood pressure
In westernised societies, blood pressure progressively increases with ageing beginning in childhood. Systolic blood pressure increases linearly with age whereas diastolic blood pressure peaks at age 50 to 60 years and declines in later life (Franklin et al., 1997). Also see: Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures.
The age-related pattern of blood pressure is seen in both men and women, but there is a gender difference, with women starting at a lower blood pressure level than men and catching up by the sixth decade. Given the age dynamics of blood pressure, 50 to 80% of the European and North American population aged 65 to 74 years can be classified as hypertensive using the 140/90 mmHg threshold (Wolf-Maier et al., 2003). Also see: Hypertension prevalences by age group.
Data from the Framingham Heart Study indicate that the residual lifetime risk of hypertension in middle-aged individuals without evidence of high blood pressure is 90% (Ramachandran et al., 2002).
The age-related increase in systolic blood pressure is mainly responsible for increasing incidence and prevalence of high blood pressure with ageing (Franklin et al., 1997). Systolic hypertension is the predominant form of hypertension in middle-aged and elderly individuals (Franklin et al., 2001).
Therefore, from age 50 onwards, systolic blood pressure is the more powerful cardiovascular risk factor, whereas diastolic blood pressure is more important in the younger population.
Physical inactivity and overweight promote high blood pressure
Several lifestyle related factors have been identified as important risk factors for high blood pressure.
Dietary components, particularly insufficient fruit and vegetable intake, high consumption of saturated fat, low fish intake, and high sodium and low potassium intake are related to high blood pressure. Dietary patterns based on the so-called DASH diet, a diet rich in fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy products, have proven to lower blood pressure (Sacks et al., 2001). Epidemiological studies suggest that dietary salt intake is directly related to blood pressure elevation (WHO/FAO, 2002). Increased fish intake (or supplementation of fish oil) have been shown to lower blood pressure (Dickinson et al., 2006; Bao et al., 1998). Coffee consumption may slightly increase blood pressure (Noordzij et al., 2005), but long-term effects on hypertension incidence seem to be very small (Uiterwaal et al., 2007; Hu et al., 2007).
Until recently there was a general consensus that light to moderate amounts of regular alcohol consumption do not seem to have a negative impact on blood pressure (Marmot et al., 1994, Fuchs et al., 2001), but this finding has been questioned in a recent study (Chen et al., 2008). Binge drinking, or drinking high amounts of alcohol at one occasion, has, however, been associated with a particularly high risk of stroke reflecting a substantial blood pressure increase (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007).
Impact of stress and psychosocial factors on high blood pressure is not yet clear
Genetic determinants of high blood pressure are unclear
Some genetic abnormalities associated with rare types of hypertension have been identified recently. Despite these findings, genetic abnormalities have not been found to be responsible for an appreciable proportion of the burden of high blood pressure in the population (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2004).
Impact of lifestyle on hypertension prevalence is substantial
Population-based data from selected countries (Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and USA) have been used to estimate the burden of hypertension attributable to overweight, dietary components, and physical activity (Geleijnse et al., 2004). Overweight was the most important contributor to hypertension in all countries except Italy (range 11-25% of hypertension due to overweight depending on country). If the effects of additional risk factors are taken into account, around 40% of hypertension prevalence (depending on the population) can be subscribed to overweight, diet, and physical inactivity. It should, however, be noted that these data are based on estimations that have been derived from simplified models. While the findings of this study should therefore be interpreted with caution, they do indicate that selected lifestyle factors have a major impact on hypertension prevalence in populations.
16 March 2009
Blood pressure
Interventions
Lifestyle changes are important in the prevention and management of hypertension
There is ample evidence that lifestyle changes lower blood pressure and can prevent the onset and progression of hypertension. A healthy lifestyle is the cornerstone of hypertension prevention and management. Lifestyle changes with documented efficacy include weight loss, increased physical activity, modification of diet such as increased fruit and vegetable consumptions, dietary sodium restriction, and moderation of alcohol consumption (Whelton et al., 2002b). For a complete overview see Lifestyle modifications for hypertension prevention and management.
Even moderate weight loss lowers blood pressure
Weight loss is important for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Weight loss, achieved by energy restriction, physical activity, or both, transfers directly into blood pressure reduction. Pooled data from intervention studies show that both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decrease approximately 1 mmHg per kilogram of weight loss (systolic BP -1.05 mmHg, diastolic BP – 0.92 mmHg) (Neter et al., 2003). The effect of weight loss on blood pressure is more pronounced with a more substantial weight loss of >5 kg. Weight reduction, however, is difficult to maintain in the long-run. But studies show that even modest weight reductions, defined as 5% to 10% of initial weight, lower blood pressure significantly (Mertens & Van Gaal, 2000; Stevens et al., 2001). Therefore, even a modest weight reduction, if maintained over a longer period, is a desirable goal in hypertension prevention and management.
Regular physical activity leads to blood pressure reduction
Increased physical activity or fitness is associated with lower blood pressure (Whelton et al., 2002; Fagard, 2001; Cornelissen & Fagard, 2005). Pooled data from intervention studies show that dynamic endurance training (e.g. walking, jogging, swimming) reduces both systolic and diastolic blood pressure by approximately 3 mmHg (Cornelissen & Fagard, 2005). Blood pressure reductions are greater in persons with hypertension than in people with a normal blood pressure (systolic BP/ diastolic BP reductions of approximately -7/-5 mmHg vs. -2/-1.5 mmHg). Dynamic resistance training (activities that use muscular strength to move a weight or work against a resistance load) also lowers blood pressure by approximately 3 mmHg (Cornelissen & Fagard, 2005b). Intensive isometric exercise such as heavy weight lifting should be avoided by people with high blood pressure. Increased physical activity reduces the risk for cardiovascular disease beyond blood pressure. Physical training also reduces body weight, waist circumference and body fat, and leads to an increase in insulin sensitivity and HDL-cholesterol (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007). The positive effects of physical activity are seen even at moderate exercise levels (Fagard, 2001). Therefore, physical exercise of moderate intensity for about 30-45 minutes per day on most days of the week is an important component of hypertension prevention and treatment. For more detailed information about the benefits of physical activity see the EUphact Physical activity.
Multiple dietary factors can effectively lower blood pressure
Dietary modifications which contribute to blood pressure reduction are restriction of sodium intake, increased potassium consumption, moderation of alcohol consumption, and an overall healthy diet according to the DASH eating plan (Appel et al., 2006). See for more information: Diet-related lifestyle modifications that effectively lower blood pressure.
Analysis of pooled data show that sodium restriction lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure by about 2 to 5 mmHg and 1 to 3 mm Hg, respectively (He & MacGregor, 2002; Dickinson et al., 2006, Sacks et al., 2001). Blood pressure reduction appears to be greater in subjects with high blood pressure. The individual response to sodium restriction varies and also depends on dietary and genetic factors (Appel et al., 2006). An increase in potassium intake is recommended to lower blood pressure, though studies and also meta-analysis analyses have found inconsistent results (Appel et al., 2006, Dickinson et al., 2006, Jiang He & Whelton, 1997). Studies show that a reduction of alcohol consumption leads on average to blood pressure reductions of approximately 3 mmHg systolic and 2 mmHg diastolic (Xin et al., 2001). Blood pressure reductions appear to be greater with greater alcohol reduction and in those with higher initial blood pressure. For more information on the consequences of alcohol consumption see the EUphact Alcohol use.
The DASH diet has also been shown to be an effective intervention method. It has been successful in reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 5.5 and 3 mmHg, respectively (Appel et al., 1997). A diet emphasizing only fruits and vegetables also reduces blood pressure though only achieving about half the effect observed with the full DASH diet. The dietary effects on blood pressure seem to occur rapidly (within weeks). Fish oil supplementation, due to its side effects and the high dose required, is not routinely recommended to lower blood pressure, though pooled data from studies show that high-dose supplementation is associated with blood pressure reduction (Geleijnse et al., 2002; Dickinson et al., 2006). Calcium and magnesium supplementation are also discussed as a potential means to lower blood pressure, but data are inconsistent and insufficient to recommend supplementation (Appel et al., 2006).
.
Effective medication is available to lower blood pressure
If lifestyle modifications are insufficient to lower blood pressure or if the initial blood pressure is substantially raised (grade 3 hypertension according to ESC/ ESH guidelines), pharmacological treatment is required. The primary goal of treatment is to achieve maximum reduction in the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease which requires treatment of raised blood pressure per se as well as of all other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking, raised cholesterol levels, raised blood glucose/ diabetes (ESH/ESC Task Force, 2007). Several classes of medications are available for blood pressure lowering and have been shown to be effective and safe. In studies, this so-called antihypertensive medication has been associated with reductions in stroke incidence (on average 35-40%), myocardial infarction (20-25%), and heart failure (50%) (Neal et al., 2000). More detailed information on pharmacological treatment can be found in national and European hypertension guidelines, as shown in the Definition and Scope.
A public health strategy is warranted in primary prevention of hypertension
A small decrease in population blood pressure is likely to result in a substantial reduction in cardiovascular disease and mortality. For example, an average reduction of approx. 1 mmHg among males and 2 mmHg among females in population diastolic blood pressure between 2000 and 2010 is estimated to prevent about 6,500 annual deaths in the UK (Unal et al., 2005b). Because of the high prevalence of high blood pressure and the high lifetime risk of hypertension, a population-based strategy aiming at a downward shift of blood pressure in the general population is an important component of hypertension prevention. A high-risk approach aiming at blood pressure reductions in those who are at particular risk to develop hypertension (e.g. with a family history of hypertension, those who are overweight, obese or sedentary) is recommended to complement the population approach (Whelton et al., 2002b).
Chushing’s syndrome, other gluccocorticoid excess states, chronic steroid therapy
Drug induced or drug related
Obstructive uropathy
Pheochromocytoma
Primary aldosteronism and other mineralcorticoid excess states
Renovascular hypertension
Sleep apnea
Thyroid or parathyroid disease
3 June 2008
Blood pressure
Landmark study identifies risk factors and characteristics of cardiovascular disease
Landmark study identifies the risk factors and characteristics of cardiovascular disease
The Framingham Heart Study is a landmark study that identified many risk factors and characteristics od cardiovascular diseases for the first time. The initial study started in 1948 in the town of Framingham, Massachusetts, USA. Initially, 5,209 men and women aged 30 to 62 years free of cardiovascular disease participated in the study. Study participants were extensively examined and interviewed at baseline and regularly followed up with regard to the development of cardiovascular diseases. Meanwhile the Framingham Study includes also a second generation study cohort, the so-called Framingham Offspring Study that started in 1971, and the Generation III cohort which is currently being recruited and examined. Currently, more than 1300 scientific reports from the Framingham Study have been published. For more information see the US National Heart Lung and Blood Institute website.
13 May 2008
Blood pressure
Lifestyle modifications to prevent and manage hypertension
Lifestyle modifications to prevent and manage hypertension
The following lifestyle modifications are recommended for the prevention and management of hypertension (adapted from: Whelton et al., 2002b):
maintain normal body weight for adults (body mass index, 18.5-24.9 kg/m2);
reduce dietary sodium intake to no more than 100 mmol/d (approx. 6g of sodium chloride or 2.4 g of sodium per day);
engage in regular aerobic physical activity such as brisk walking (at least 30 minutes per day on most days of the week);
limit alcohol consumption to no more than 30 mL of ethanol (e.g. 720 mL of beer, 300 mL of wine, or 60 mL of liquor) per day in most men and no more than 15 mL of ethanol per day in women and lighter weight persons;
maintain adequate intake of dietary potassium (>90 mmol/d or 3,500 mg per day); and
consume a diet rich in fruits and vegetables and in low-fat dairy products with a reduced content of saturated and total fat (according to the DASH eating plan).
3 June 2008
Blood pressure
Diet-related lifestyle modifications that effectively lower blood pressure
Diet-related lifestyle modifications that effectively lower blood pressure (Appel et al., 2006)
Lifestyle Modification
Recommendation
Weight loss
For overweight or obese persons, lose weight, ideally attaining a BMI <25 kg/m2; for nonoverweight persons,
maintain desirable BMI <25 kg/m2
Reduced salt intake
Lower salt (sodium chloride) intake as much as possible, ideally to ≈ 65 mmol/d sodium (corresponding to 1.5 g/d of sodium)
or 3.8 g/d sodium chloride)
DASH-type dietary patterns
Consume a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (8–10 servings/d), rich in low-fat dairy products (2–3 servings/d), and reduced in
saturated fat and cholesterol
Increased potassium intake
Increase potassium intake to 120 mmol/d (4.7 g/d), which is also the level provided in DASH-type diets
Moderation of alcohol intake
For those who drink alcohol, consume ≤2 alcoholic drinks/d (men) and ≤1 alcoholic drink/d (women)
The underlying data for the above presentation was obtained from the WHO Global InfoBase. The trend lines were created using estimated data for 2002, 2005 and 2010. The data that the WHO presents in this database are obtained from national and sub-national surveys and are adjusted for definitions (e.g. cut-off points, data collection techniques), to a standard set of age-groups, for non-representative data to the national population, to a standard reporting year using available trend info and to the standard WHO population. For more detailed source information see the FAQ sheet of the WHO Global InfoBase.
The underlying data for the above presentation was obtained from the WHO Global InfoBase. The trend lines were created using estimated data for 2002, 2005 and 2010. The data that the WHO presents in this database are obtained from national and sub-national surveys and are adjusted for definitions (e.g. cut-off points, data collection techniques), to a standard set of age-groups, for non-representative data to the national population, to a standard reporting year using available trend info and to the standard WHO population. For more detailed source information see the FAQ sheet of the WHO Global InfoBase.
Data originate from population-based, national surveys. Surveys were based either on random population samples of the entire nation or on a series of regional samples. None were restricted to a single region or province within a country. The number of participants in the different surveys ranged from 1823 (Sweden) to 23129 (Canada).
The response rate varied from 61% (Germany) to 87.5% (England).
The age distribution in the original surveys varied from 35 to 64 years (Spain) to 18 to 80 years (United States).
The surveys were conducted at different points in time from 1986 to 1999.
Blood pressure measurements were obtained using a mercury sphygmomanometer in all surveys except for England, where an automatic, electronic measurement device was used.
At least two blood pressure measurements were performed in all surveys. The time interval between the two measurements was 1 to 3 minutes in all surveys, except Canada, where 10 to 60 minutes passed between both measurements. Prevalences presented in this figure are based on the second measurement.
For comparison of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the European vs. the North American countries presented in the graph, mean blood pressure measurements were averaged using each country as a single unit.
Reported prevalences were adjusted by age.
For a more detailed overview of the survey characteristics per country see the data source for this presentation: Wolf-Maier et al., 2003.
Data originate from population-based, national surveys. Surveys were based either on random population samples of the entire nation or on a series of regional samples. None were restricted to a single region or province within a country. The number of participants in the different surveys ranged from 1823 (Sweden) to 23129 (Canada).
The response rate varied from 61% (Germany) to 87.5% (England). The age distribution in the original surveys varied from 35 to 64 years (Spain) to 18 to 80 years (United States).
The age distribution in the original surveys varied from 35 to 64 years (Spain) to 18 to 80 years (United States).
The surveys were conducted at different points in time from 1986 to 1999.
Blood pressure measurements were obtained using a mercury sphygmomanometer in all surveys except for England, where an automatic, electronic measurement device was used.
At least two blood pressure measurements were performed in all surveys. The time interval between the two measurements was 1 to 3 minutes in all surveys, except Canada, where 10 to 60 minutes passed between both measurements.
Mean blood pressure presented in the graph is based on the second measurement.
Mean blood pressures were calculated for sex-specific 5-year age groups.
For comparison of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the European vs. the North American countries presented in the graph, mean blood pressure measurements were averaged using each country as a single unit.
The above data presentation was taken from Wolf-Maier et al., 2003. It is based on population-based, national surveys carried out in the United States, Canada, England, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden. Surveys were based either on random population samples of the entire nation or on a series of regional samples. None were restricted to a single region or province within a country. The number of participants in the different surveys ranged from 1823 (Sweden) to 23129 (Canada).
The response rate varied from 61% (Germany) to 87.5% (England).
The age distribution in the original surveys varied from 35 to 64 years (Spain) to 18 to 80 years (United States).
The surveys were conducted at different points in time from 1986 to 1999.
Blood pressure measurements were obtained using a mercury sphygmomanometer in all surveys except for England, where an automatic, electronic measurement device was used.
At least two blood pressure measurements were performed in all surveys. The time interval between the two measurements was 1 to 3 minutes in all surveys, except Canada, where 10 to 60 minutes passed between both measurements.
Mean blood pressure presented in the graph is based on the second measurement.
Mean blood pressures were calculated for sex-specific 5-year age groups.
For comparison of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the European vs. the North American countries presented in the graph, mean blood pressure measurements were averaged using each country as a single unit.
Prevalence of hypertension in people aged 20 years and older by world region and sex in 2000 (upper) and 2025 (lower) (Kearney et al., 2005)
The above figure, Figure 1: Prevalence of hypertension in people aged 20 years and older by world region and sex in 2000 (upper) and 2025 (lower), is reproduced from Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217-23, with permission from Elsevier (see: Kearney et al., 2005).
Remarks
The data presented above were obtained from a literature search of the MEDLINE database, manual searches of bibliographies of retrieved articles, and searching the WHO Global Cardiovascular InfoBase.
The literature search included studies published from 1 January 1980 to 31 December 2002.
Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
(1)
Population-based cross-sectional survey reporting sex-specific and age-specific prevalence of hypertension (or data from which prevalence could be calculated)
(2)
Methods for blood pressure measurement were reported
(3)
Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication
Where available, a national study for a country was used as data source. If no national study was available, the largest and most recent multisite or regional study was used.
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers according to a standardized protocol.
The grouping of countries was made according to the World Bank’s World Development Report 1993.
In total, 30 studies were included (10 from established market economies, 1 from former socialist economies, 2 from middle eastern crescent, 5 from India, 1 from China, 3 from other Asian islands, 3 from Latin America and the Caribbean, and 5 from Sub-Saharan Africa)
For 163 countries worldwide, valid data on hypertension prevalence was unavailable. For these countries, data from the country within the same world region with the most similar gross national income per capita was applied instead.
17 of the 30 studies did not provide data for the full age range of ≥20 years. For each of the 17 studies, data for the missing age ranges were estimated with statistical modeling.
For the region of former socialist economies no study met the inclusion criteria. A large study from Slovakia reporting hypertension prevalence with a different definition (≥160/ 95 mmHg) was used and a conversion factor from the English National Hypertension study was applied to estimate hypertension prevalence according to the inclusion criteria (≥140/ 90 mmHg).
For India and Cameroon (region Sub-Saharan Africa), rural and urban studies were combined and weighted according by the proportion of the population living in urban and rural areas.
Various methods were used to measure blood pressure in the different studies. Most studies (23) used a standard mercury sphygmomanometer as device. In most studies (24), participants rested for at least five minutes before before blood pressure measurement.
Hypertension prevalence was age-standardised according to the 1990 world population separately for men and women.
The crude age-specific and sex-specific hypertension prevalences for each country were applied to the WHO population counts in 2000. The estimates for 2025 are based on projected population changes and did not include potential changes of hypertension frequency.
Spot maps of population changes in average systolic blood pressure (WHO, 2003)
Remarks
The above data presentation is a reproduction of a figure presented in the WHO MONICA Monograph and Multimedia Sourcebook (WHO, 2003). The WHO MONICA Project is an international collaborative study carried out from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s.
Data were collected in independent random samples at the beginning and the end (optionally also in the middle) of the ten year survey period.
Standardized survey methods were applied across different populations and over time.
Population-based samples from geographically defined areas in 21 countries have been included in the MONICA Project.
The timing of the initial and final surveys differed by study population. Generally, these surveys were 8 to 10 years apart but the interval could be as little as six years. Calendar years and months varied across study populations.
The map shows changes in average systolic blood pressure between the initial and the final survey for the different MONICA study populations from the geographically defined areas.
Blood pressure measurements were performed by specifically trained observers.
Blood pressure was measured either with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer or with a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Blood pressure was measured twice on the right upper arm in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest. Blood pressure values were recorded to the nearest 2 mmHg. The mean value of both readings is used for analyses.
Absolute risk of cardiovascular disease over 5 years in patients by systolic blood pressure at specified level of other risk factors (source: Jackson et al., 2005)
The above figure, Figure 4. Absolute risk of cardiovascular disease over 5 years in patients by systolic blood pressure at specified levels of other risk factors is reproduced from Rod Jackson, Carlene MM Lawes, Derrick A Bennett, Richard J Milne and Anthony Rodgers, Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and blood cholesterol based on an individual's absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet 2005, 365: 434-41 with permission from Elsevier (see Jackson et al., 2005).
Data originate from the Framingham Heart Study. Data are based on 5573 participants of the Framingham Heart Study and the Framingham Offspring Study aged 30 to 74 years.
Baseline characteristics were measured from 1968 to 1975 and 12 years of follow-up were included in the analyses. Only participants without a history of cardiovascular disease and cancer were included.
The risk of cardiovascular disease according to risk factor status as presented in the graph was estimated with statistical modelling. The reference category is a non-diabetic, non-smoker female aged 50 years with a total cholesterol level of 4.0mmol/L and HDL of 1.6mmol/L. Risks are given for systolic blood pressure levels of 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170 and 180 mmHg. In other categories additional risk factors are added consecutively, for example, the diabetes category is a diabetic 50-year old male cigarette smoker with a total cholesterol of 7 mmol/L and HDL of 1mmol/L. TC= total cholesterol.
Results of this study are not directly transferable to European populations because the Framingham Study has been shown to overestimate the risk of cardiovascular disease in particular European populations (see for example: Hense et al., 2003).
Age-adjusted hypertension awareness, treatment and control in the population and control in treated hypertensive patients aged 35-64 in six European countries, Canada and the United States (source: Wolf-Maier et al., 2004)
Hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication.
Awareness: answering “yes” to the question “Have you ever been told that you have high blood pressure” among hypertensives, ie. those with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication.
Hypertension treatment: Use of antihypertensive medication among hypertensives, ie. those with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication.
Hypertension control in the population: Blood pressure <140/90 mmHg among hypertensives, ie. those with systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication.
Hypertension control in treated hypertensives: Blood pressure <140/90 mmHg amongt those with antihypertensive medication.
Data originate from population-based, national surveys. Surveys were based either on random population samples of the entire nation or on a series of regional samples. None were restricted to a single region or province within a country. The number of participants in the different surveys ranged from 1823 (Sweden) to 23129 (Canada).
The response rate varied from 61% (Germany) to 87.5% (England).
The age distribution in the original surveys varied from 35 to 64 years (Spain) to 18 to 80 years (United States).
The surveys were conducted at different points in time from 1986 to 1999.
Blood pressure measurements were obtained using a mercury sphygmomanometer in all surveys except for England, where an automatic, electronic measurement device was used.
At least two blood pressure measurements were performed in all surveys. The time interval between the two measurements was 1 to 3 minutes in all surveys, except Canada, where 10 to 60 minutes passed between both measurements. Prevalences presented in this figure are based on the second measurement.
For comparison of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the European vs. the North American countries, mean blood pressure measurements were averaged using each country as a single unit.
For a more detailed overview of the survey characteristics per country see the data source for this presentation: Wolf-Maier et al., 2004.
Ischaemic heart disease mortality rate in each decade of age versus usual blood pressure at the start of that decade (source: Lewington et al., 2002)
The above figure, Figure 4. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality rate in each decade of age versus usual blood pressure at the start of that decade, is reproduced from Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903-13 with permission from Elsevier (see: Lewington et al., 2002).
Remarks
Data were obtained from one million adults with no previous vascular disease in 61 prospective observational studies on blood pressure and mortality.
The authors sought to include all prospective observational studies that collected data on blood pressure, blood cholesterol, date of birth (or age), and sex at baseline, and in which cause of death and date of death (or age at death) for all participants during more than 5000 person years of follow-up were available.
Studies were identified through computer searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE, hand searches of meeting abstracts, and discussions with study investigators.
Studies that identified participants based on a positive history of stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) were excluded. Participants with a history of stroke or ischaemic heart disease (IHD) from the 61 contributing studies were also excluded.
In 58 out of the 61 studies blood pressure was measured. In three studies, blood pressure was self reported. In aggregate, these three studies and the remaining 58 studies gave similar results.
Blood pressure was measured variously across different studies using standard or random-zero sphygmomanometers. Similar results were found for studies with these two different methods. Blood pressure was typically measured in a sitting position.
Cause of death was assessed as detailed as possible according to the ICD coding. In most studies, cause of death was recorded from death certificates. Information on stroke and IHD deaths was available for 99.8% of the participants’ follow-up (all but one study). Vascular causes of death other than stroke and IHD were available for 76% of the participants’ follow-up (all but seven studies).
Usual blood pressure at the beginning of each decade was estimated and corrected for potential bias from the data of the 61 studies.
Stroke mortality rate in each decade of age, versus usual blood pressure at the start of that decade (source: Lewington et al., 2002)
The above figure, Figure 2: Stroke mortality rate in each decade of age versus usual blood pressure at the start of that decade, is reproduced from Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002;360:1903-13 with permission from Elsevier (see: Lewington et al., 2002).
Remarks
The data presented above were obtained from one million adults with no previous vascular disease in 61 prospective observational studies on blood pressure and mortality.
The authors sought to include all prospective observational studies that collected data on blood pressure, blood cholesterol, date of birth (or age), and sex at baseline, and in which cause of death and date of death (or age at death) for all participants during more than 5000 person years of follow-up were available.
Studies were identified through computer searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE, hand searches of meeting abstracts, and discussions with study investigators.
Studies that identified participants based on a positive history of stroke and coronary heart disease were excluded. Participants with a history of stroke or ischaemic heart disease (IHD) from the 61 contributing studies were also excluded
In 58 out of the 61 studies blood pressure was measured. In three studies, blood pressure was self reported. In aggregate, these three studies and the remaining 58 studies gave similar results.
Blood pressure was measured variously across different studies using standard or random-zero sphygmomanometers. Similar results were found for studies with these two different methods. Blood pressure was typically measured in a sitting position.
Cause of death was assessed as detailed as possible according to the coding. In most studies, cause of death was recorded from death certificates. Information on stroke and IHD deaths was available for 99.8% of the participants’ follow-up (all but one study). Vascular causes of death other than stroke and IHD were available for 76% of the participants’ follow-up (all but seven studies).
Usual blood pressure at the beginning of each decade was estimated and corrected for potential bias from the data of the 61 studies.
Stroke, ischaemic heart disease and other vascular mortality: age-specific hazard ratios for given differences in usual blood pressure (source: Lewington et al., 2002)
The above figure, Figure 1: Stroke, ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and other vascular mortality: age-specific hazard ratios for given differences in usual blood pressure, is reproduced from Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R, Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903-13 with permission from Elsevier (see: Lewington et al., 2002)
Remarks
The data presented above were obtained from one million adults with no previous vascular disease in 61 prospective observational studies on blood pressure and mortality.The column “Number of deaths” refers to the number of death in the specified age groups in the study cohorts.
The hazard ratio can be interpreted as the relative risk for an event (in this case stroke, ischaemic heart disease, or other vascular disease) in persons whose systolic blood pressure is 20 mmHg lower (Figure A) or diastolic blood pressure is 10 mmHg lower (Figure B) compared with the reference person. A hazard ratio of 1 indicates no difference between both groups, a ratio <1 indicates a protective effect (reduced risk) and a ratio >1 indicates a hazardous effect (increased risk).
The authors sought to include all prospective observational studies that collected data on blood pressure, blood cholesterol, date of birth (or age), and sex at baseline, and in which cause of death and date of death (or age at death) for all participants during more than 5000 person years of follow-up were available.
Studies were identified through computer searches in MEDLINE and EMBASE, hand searches of meeting abstracts, and discussions with study investigators.
Studies that identified participants based on a positive history of stroke and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) were excluded. Participants with a history of stroke or IHD from the 61 contributing studies were also excluded.
In 58 out of the 61 studies blood pressure was measured. In three studies, blood pressure was self reported. In aggregate, these three studies and the remaining 58 studies gave similar results.
Blood pressure was measured variously across different studies using standard or random-zero sphygmomanometers. Similar results were found for studies with these two different methods. Blood pressure was typically measured in a sitting position.
Cause of death was assessed as detailed as possible according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding. In most studies, cause of death was recorded from death certificates. Information on stroke and CHD deaths was available for 99.8% of the participants’ follow-up (all but one study). Vascular causes of death other than stroke and CHD were available for 76% of the participants’ follow-up (all but seven studies)
Shares of seven leading risk factors in the DALY burden in the WHO European Region, 2000 (source: WHO, 2005f)
Risk factor
Total DALYS (%)
A. High Blood Pressure
12.8
B. Tobacco
12.3
C. Alcohol
10.1
D. High blood cholesterol
8.7
E. Overweight
7.8
F. Low Fruit and vegetable intake
4.4
G. Physical Inactivity
3.5
Total
59.6
Remarks
The above table is a reproduction of table 5 from the 2005 WHO European health report (WHO, 2005f). The explanatory information presented below was also taken from this Report.
The country estimates for risk factors are based on the comparative risk assessment analyses carried out for the World Health Report 2002 (WHO, 2002d), but with updated country burden and country-specific exposure data for around four of the risk factors. For most risk factors, either the data for average exposure for the country groups, or the overall disease-specific population the data for average exposure for the country groups, or the overall disease-specific population attributable fractions (PAFs) for the country groups were used at the country level. In particular, the country-specific alcohol exposures are based on a preliminary adjustment of subregional consumption distributions, using country estimates of abstainers and apparent consumption.
The risk factors and conditions are interrelated. Individual risk factors are linked to different proportions of the total burden in DALYs.
Purely arithmetically, the sum of the DALYs attributable to each of the risk factors individually amounts to 60% of the total in the Region. This does not mean that the joint impact of those risk factors on the population’s health amounts to 60% of the total DALYs. It is less, because several diseases are caused by more than one risk factor, and each factor contributes to more than one condition.
The WHO MONICA Project is an international collaborative study carried out from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s (WHO MONICA, 2003).
Data were collected in independent random samples at the beginning and the end (optionally also in the middle) of the ten year survey period. Standardized survey methods were applied across different populations and over time. Population-based samples from geographically defined areas in 21 countries have been included in the Project. The above figure presents data for men only. Also see Average systolic blood pressure among women.
The timing of the initial and final surveys differed by study population. Generally, these surveys were 8 to 10 years apart but the interval could be as little as six years. Calendar years and months varied across study populations. Calendar years and months varied across study populations. Data presented in the figure refer to the final risk factor survey in every region.
The average systolic blood pressure shown in the graph refers to the age group 35-64 years. Blood pressure measurements were performed by specifically trained observers. Blood pressure was measured either with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer or with a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Blood pressure was measured twice on the right upper arm in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest. Blood pressure values were recorded to the nearest 2 mmHg. The mean value of both readings is displayed in the graph.
The WHO MONICA Project is an international collaborative study carried out from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s (WHO MONICA, 2003).
Data were collected in independent random samples at the beginning and the end (optionally also in the middle) of the ten year survey period. Standardized survey methods were applied across different populations and over time. Population-based samples from geographically defined areas in 21 countries have been included in the MONICA Project. The above figure shows data for women only. Also see Average systolic blood pressure among men.
The timing of the initial and final surveys differed by study population. Generally, these surveys were 8 to 10 years apart but the interval could be as little as six years. Calendar years and months varied across study populations. Data presented in the figure refer to the final risk factor survey in every region.
The average systolic blood pressure shown in the graph refers to the age group 35-64 years. Blood pressure measurements were performed by specifically trained observers. Blood pressure was measured either with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer or with a random-zero sphygmomanometer.
Blood pressure was measured twice on the right upper arm in a sitting position after at least 5 minutes of rest. Blood pressure values were recorded to the nearest 2 mmHg. The mean value of both readings is displayed in the graph.
Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH.
Effect of resistance training on reting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
J Hypertens, 2005b; 23: 251-259.
Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND et al.
Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure: The Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation, 1997; 96: 308 –315.
Hense HW, Schulte H, Löwel H et al.
Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany- results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts.
Eur Heart J, 2003; 24: 937-45.
Jiang He, Whelton PK.
Epidemiology and prevention of hypertension. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; and Dean's Office (PKW), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Medical Clinics of North America 1997; 81 (5): 1077-1097.
Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH.
Effect of resistance training on reting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
J Hypertens, 2005b; 23: 251-259.
Franklin SS, Gustin W, Wong ND et al.
Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure: The Framingham Heart Study.
Circulation, 1997; 96: 308 –315.
Hense HW, Schulte H, Löwel H et al.
Framingham risk function overestimates risk of coronary heart disease in men and women from Germany- results from the MONICA Augsburg and the PROCAM cohorts.
Eur Heart J, 2003; 24: 937-45.
Jiang He, Whelton PK.
Epidemiology and prevention of hypertension. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology; and Dean's Office (PKW), Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Medical Clinics of North America 1997; 81 (5): 1077-1097.